Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Here is a patch so that the backend is linked in one piece instead of using
the SUBSYS.o files.
The question is how we want to activate that. I currently used make
BIGLINK=1, which is obviously just for testing. Should we just turn it on by
default and see if
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Here is a patch so that the backend is linked in one piece instead of using
the SUBSYS.o files.
The question is how we want to activate that. I currently used make
BIGLINK=1, which is obviously just for testing. Should we just turn it on by
Am Freitag, 22. Februar 2008 schrieb Tom Lane:
What is the build time like with vs without this?
It's virtually indistinguishable. The big linker call doesn't take any
measurable extra time.
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
---(end of
Am Freitag, 22. Februar 2008 schrieb Alvaro Herrera:
Hmm. Do we need the text file? I was kinda hoping we could just aggregate
each subdir's OBJS into a big variable listing all the needed files, and
then invoking the linker with that.
Well, my goal here was that we could use both ways of
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Eventually, we could ideally transform the subdirectory Makefiles from
independently callable Makefiles to mere include files so we have only one
big dependency tree at the top, which would get rid of the annoying and
time-consuming directory traversal. This,
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Well, my goal here was that we could use both ways of building for a while
because we have no experience with how long command lines and argument lists
we can handle portably.
Yeah, I think it would be folly to assume that we can name all the
Am Freitag, 22. Februar 2008 schrieb Tom Lane:
Yeah, I think it would be folly to assume that we can name all the
individual object files in one big command line. But isn't the current
patch trying to do exactly that?
The current patch assumes that it works in most environments and offers the
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Am Freitag, 22. Februar 2008 schrieb Tom Lane:
Yeah, I think it would be folly to assume that we can name all the
individual object files in one big command line. But isn't the current
patch trying to do exactly that?
The current patch assumes that
Here is a patch so that the backend is linked in one piece instead of using
the SUBSYS.o files.
The question is how we want to activate that. I currently used make
BIGLINK=1, which is obviously just for testing. Should we just turn it on by
default and see if anyone complains?
--
Peter
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 7:48 AM, Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here is a patch so that the backend is linked in one piece instead of using
the SUBSYS.o files.
The question is how we want to activate that. I currently used make
BIGLINK=1, which is obviously just for testing.
10 matches
Mail list logo