Re: [HACKERS] Linking the previously separated documentation

On Feb 9, 2004, at 6:23 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote: Michael Glaesemann wrote: If I'm understanding you correctly, that's what I'm doing. Here's an example of the change: Original: Please familiarize yourself with the pg_dump reference page. Revised: Please familiarize yourself with

Re: [HACKERS] Linking the previously separated documentation

Michael Glaesemann wrote: > If I'm understanding you correctly, that's what I'm doing. Here's an > example of the change: > > Original: > Please familiarize yourself with the > pg_dump reference page. > > Revised: > Please familiarize yourself with the > > reference page. If y

Re: [HACKERS] Linking the previously separated documentation

On Feb 9, 2004, at 2:16 PM, Tom Lane wrote: Michael Glaesemann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: I've been eyeing providing links between the previously separated documentation books, ... Is anyone else working on something like this? Is it worthwhile? There's been talk of this earlier, but I don't reca

Re: [HACKERS] Linking the previously separated documentation

Michael Glaesemann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I've been eyeing providing links between the previously separated > documentation books, ... > Is anyone else working on something like this? Is it worthwhile? There's been talk of this earlier, but I don't recall anyone specifically saying they'd

[HACKERS] Linking the previously separated documentation

Hello all! I've been eyeing providing links between the previously separated documentation books, e.g., linking this sentence "Please familiarize yourself with the pg_dump reference page." in the backup and restore section to the app