On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 03:23:44PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 12:17 PM, Noah Misch n...@leadboat.com wrote:
As I pondered this, I felt it would do better to solve a different problem.
The rm -rf invocations presumably crept in to reduce peak disk usage.
On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 8:09 AM, Noah Misch n...@leadboat.com wrote:
On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 03:23:44PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 12:17 PM, Noah Misch n...@leadboat.com wrote:
As I pondered this, I felt it would do better to solve a different problem.
The rm -rf
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 12:17 PM, Noah Misch n...@leadboat.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 02:59:55PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 2:38 PM, Noah Misch wrote:
Solaris 10 ships Perl 5.8.4, and RHEL 5.11 ships Perl 5.8.8. Therefore,
Perl
installations lacking
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 02:59:55PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 2:38 PM, Noah Misch wrote:
Solaris 10 ships Perl 5.8.4, and RHEL 5.11 ships Perl 5.8.8. Therefore,
Perl
installations lacking this File::Path feature will receive vendor support
for
years to
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 2:38 PM, Noah Misch wrote:
Solaris 10 ships Perl 5.8.4, and RHEL 5.11 ships Perl 5.8.8. Therefore, Perl
installations lacking this File::Path feature will receive vendor support for
years to come. Replacing the use of keep_root with rmtree+mkdir will add 2-10
lines of
Hi all,
I noticed that src/bin/initdb/t/001_initdb.pl uses directly rm via a
system() call like that:
system_or_bail rm -rf '$tempdir'/*;
This way of doing is not portable, particularly on platforms that do
not have rm like... Windows where the equivalent is del. And we could
actually use
On Apr 14, 2015, at 9:05 AM, Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
http://perldoc.perl.org/File/Path.html
With this formulation:
remove_tree($tempdir, {keep_root = 1});
Does Perl 5.8 have this?
Yes, it does.
http://cpansearch.perl.org/src/NWCLARK/perl-5.8.9/lib/File/Path.pm
Michael Paquier wrote:
Hi all,
I noticed that src/bin/initdb/t/001_initdb.pl uses directly rm via a
system() call like that:
system_or_bail rm -rf '$tempdir'/*;
This way of doing is not portable, particularly on platforms that do
not have rm like... Windows where the equivalent is del.
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 5:29 AM, Alvaro Herrera
alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
David E. Wheeler wrote:
On Apr 14, 2015, at 1:21 PM, Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
Castoroides has 5.8.4. Oops.
WUT.
Yeah, eh? Anyway I don't think it matters much: just don't enable TAP
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 05:29:36PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
David E. Wheeler wrote:
On Apr 14, 2015, at 1:21 PM, Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com
wrote:
Castoroides has 5.8.4. Oops.
WUT.
Yeah, eh? Anyway I don't think it matters much: just don't enable TAP
tests
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 09:25:33AM -0700, David E. Wheeler wrote:
On Apr 14, 2015, at 9:05 AM, Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
http://perldoc.perl.org/File/Path.html
With this formulation:
remove_tree($tempdir, {keep_root = 1});
Does Perl 5.8 have this?
Yes, it
David E. Wheeler wrote:
On Apr 14, 2015, at 9:05 AM, Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
http://perldoc.perl.org/File/Path.html
With this formulation:
remove_tree($tempdir, {keep_root = 1});
Does Perl 5.8 have this?
Yes, it does.
David E. Wheeler wrote:
On Apr 14, 2015, at 1:21 PM, Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
Castoroides has 5.8.4. Oops.
WUT.
Yeah, eh? Anyway I don't think it matters much: just don't enable TAP
tests on machines with obsolete Perl. I think this is fine since 5.8's
latest
On Apr 14, 2015, at 1:21 PM, Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
Castoroides has 5.8.4. Oops.
WUT.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
14 matches
Mail list logo
