2015-07-27 20:05 GMT+04:00 Heikki Linnakangas :
> On 07/27/2015 06:46 PM, Teodor Sigaev wrote:
>
>> I need an advice, what would be better:
>>> - to add new flag like F_HAS_GARBAGE,
>>> - or to delete all mentions of F_TUPLES_DELETED and use it in gist
>>> microvacuum.
>>>
>>
>> According to commi
On 07/27/2015 06:46 PM, Teodor Sigaev wrote:
I need an advice, what would be better:
- to add new flag like F_HAS_GARBAGE,
- or to delete all mentions of F_TUPLES_DELETED and use it in gist microvacuum.
According to commit message:
commit 2effb72e682a7dbdc9a8a60a80c22ec1fa9d8079
Author: Heikki
I need an advice, what would be better:
- to add new flag like F_HAS_GARBAGE,
- or to delete all mentions of F_TUPLES_DELETED and use it in gist microvacuum.
According to commit message:
commit 2effb72e682a7dbdc9a8a60a80c22ec1fa9d8079
Author: Heikki Linnakangas
Date: Fri Nov 7 15:03:46 2014 +
Hi,
I'm working on microvacuum for gist access method.
Briefly microvacuum includes two steps:
1. When search tells us that the tuple is invisible to all transactions it
is marked LP_DEAD and page is marked as "has dead tuples",
2. Then, when insert touches full page which has dead tuples it calls
