Re: [HACKERS] Misleading comment in slru.h

2017-06-30 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On 6/27/17 01:43, Thomas Munro wrote: > As mentioned in another thread[1], slru.h says: > > * Note: slru.c currently assumes that segment file names will be four hex > * digits. This sets a lower bound on the segment size (64K transactions > * for 32-bit TransactionIds). > > That comment

[HACKERS] Misleading comment in slru.h

2017-06-26 Thread Thomas Munro
Hi hackers, As mentioned in another thread[1], slru.h says: * Note: slru.c currently assumes that segment file names will be four hex * digits. This sets a lower bound on the segment size (64K transactions * for 32-bit TransactionIds). That comment is out of date: commit 638cf09e