Re: [HACKERS] Missing XLOG_DEBUG check in AdvanceXLInsertBuffer()?

2015-06-12 Thread Robert Haas
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 7:02 AM, Andres Freund wrote: > DEBUG: initialized 1 pages, upto 40/3977E000 > DEBUG: initialized 9 pages, upto 40/3979 > DEBUG: initialized 1 pages, upto 40/39792000 > DEBUG: initialized 1 pages, upto 40/39794000 > DEBUG: initialized 1 pages, upto 40/39796000 > DE

Re: [HACKERS] Missing XLOG_DEBUG check in AdvanceXLInsertBuffer()?

2015-06-10 Thread Michael Paquier
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 8:02 PM, Andres Freund wrote: > Does somebody mind me backpatching the missing XLOG_DEBUG &&? ISTM that it is a good idea to have it in REL9_4_STABLE as well. Regards, -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to y

[HACKERS] Missing XLOG_DEBUG check in AdvanceXLInsertBuffer()?

2015-06-10 Thread Andres Freund
Hi, When compiling with WAL_DEBUG defined, but wal_debug set to off, there's a lot of DEBUG1 spew like DEBUG: initialized 1 pages, upto 40/3977E000 DEBUG: initialized 9 pages, upto 40/3979 DEBUG: initialized 1 pages, upto 40/39792000 DEBUG: initialized 1 pages, upto 40/39794000 DEBUG: ini