Shachar Shemesh wrote:
To summarize, just give me read only access to the old project's data
and I'm set.
I second that.
- thomas
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
On Sun, 20 Mar 2005, Thomas Hallgren wrote:
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
Once I've copied both over, I'll get Chris to mark the gborg project
as being 'disabled' so that nobody will see it over there anymore ...
Ok, I submitted a request for the project under pgfoundry. Same na
I think having to be on a specific server to get automatic updates on
the front page is the problem. Moving it not the correct solution. There
are may postgresql related projects that don't live on pgfoundry, or
even gborg.
Why is this a necessity?
Can't we set up some sort of interface to the
On Sun, 20 Mar 2005, Thomas Hallgren wrote:
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
If only the CVS/Mailing lists are needed, and nothing that is "in the
database", then this shouldn't be too hard ... go to pgfoundry, submit for
the new project ... once it is approved, create the various mailing lists
that you
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
If only the CVS/Mailing lists are needed, and nothing that is "in the
database", then this shouldn't be too hard ... go to pgfoundry, submit
for the new project ... once it is approved, create the various mailing
lists that you have on gborg, and then, *before* you do any
If only the CVS/Mailing lists are needed, and nothing that is "in the
database", then this shouldn't be too hard ... go to pgfoundry, submit for
the new project ... once it is approved, create the various mailing lists
that you have on gborg, and then, *before* you do anything else on either,
I
Hi all,
When pgfoundry was opened, there was some talk about moving the projects
from gborg there. This has not, to date, happened. Is there any chance
of this happening now, even if only for the specific project? I feel
really bad about releasing a new version of ole db, with the news of the
p
