On 7/28/15 9:20 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
Well, I think that we can eventually downgrade or remove the message
once (1) we've actually fixed all of the known multixact bugs and (2)
a couple of years have gone by and most people are in the clear.
Fair enough. But we should document this better in
On 28 July 2015 at 14:20, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 4:11 AM, Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com
wrote:
On 22 July 2015 at 21:45, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
But it seemed to me that this could be rather confusing. I thought it
would be
On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 4:11 AM, Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On 22 July 2015 at 21:45, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
But it seemed to me that this could be rather confusing. I thought it
would be better to be explicit about whether the protections are
enabled in all
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 07:59:40AM +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:
On 26 July 2015 at 20:15, Noah Misch n...@leadboat.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 09:14:09PM -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On 7/22/15 4:45 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
But it seemed to me that this could be rather confusing. I
On 26 July 2015 at 20:15, Noah Misch n...@leadboat.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 09:14:09PM -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On 7/22/15 4:45 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
But it seemed to me that this could be rather confusing. I thought it
would be better to be explicit about whether the
On 22 July 2015 at 21:45, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
But it seemed to me that this could be rather confusing. I thought it
would be better to be explicit about whether the protections are
enabled in all cases. That way, (1) if you see the message saying
they are enabled, they
On 7/22/15 4:45 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
But it seemed to me that this could be rather confusing. I thought it
would be better to be explicit about whether the protections are
enabled in all cases. That way, (1) if you see the message saying
they are enabled, they are enabled; (2) if you see
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 9:14 PM, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
On 7/22/15 4:45 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
But it seemed to me that this could be rather confusing. I thought it
would be better to be explicit about whether the protections are
enabled in all cases. That way, (1) if you
Why is this message logged by default in a fresh installation? The
technicality of that message doesn't seem to match the kinds of messages
that we normally print at startup.
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 4:11 PM, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
Why is this message logged by default in a fresh installation? The
technicality of that message doesn't seem to match the kinds of messages
that we normally print at startup.
It seems nobody likes that message.
I did it
10 matches
Mail list logo
