On Wed, 2002-12-18 at 01:49, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> Looks like they've caught up on a lot of our features. I have to say I
> appreciate them adding SERIAL as an alias for AUTO_INCREMENT. Perhaps we
> should return the favour? :)
Well, it's not the same as PostgreSQL's serial (which is
> Am I missing something here, or is 4.1 vapourware? Based on mysql.com,
> 3.23.45a is current production, and 4.0.5a is current beta.
>
> I am happy to believe I missed something, but if not, I think we should
> either compare our plans for 7.4 with 4.1, or 3.2/4.0 with 7.3.
OK, fair enough.
At 02:49 PM 18/12/2002 +0800, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
Looks like they've caught up on a lot of our features.
Am I missing something here, or is 4.1 vapourware? Based on mysql.com,
3.23.45a is current production, and 4.0.5a is current beta.
I am happy to believe I missed something, but i
Looks like they've caught up on a lot of our features. I have to say I
appreciate them adding SERIAL as an alias for AUTO_INCREMENT. Perhaps we
should return the favour? :)
(BTW, sorry to ppl who aren't interested, but I think it's important to see
what other db's are doing. Also, someone asked
