"Simon Riggs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, 2007-05-01 at 17:30 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> "Simon Riggs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> I notice that we have two versions of not INHERITing:
>>> ALTER ROLE meek NOINHERIT earth;
>>>
>>> ALTER TABLE meek NO INHERIT earth;
>>
>> Where are you
On Tue, 2007-05-01 at 22:36 +0100, Gregory Stark wrote:
> "Simon Riggs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > (Yes, I understand the word means totally different thing in each case).
>
> Geez, you had me worried. So it's just the spelling that you're noting?
Yes, the space appears to be mis spelled.
On Tue, 2007-05-01 at 17:30 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Simon Riggs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I notice that we have two versions of not INHERITing:
> > ALTER ROLE meek NOINHERIT earth;
>
> > ALTER TABLE meek NO INHERIT earth;
>
> Where are you reading that?
http://developer.postgresql.org/p
"Simon Riggs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> (Yes, I understand the word means totally different thing in each case).
Geez, you had me worried. So it's just the spelling that you're noting?
--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
---(end
"Simon Riggs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I notice that we have two versions of not INHERITing:
> ALTER ROLE meek NOINHERIT earth;
> ALTER TABLE meek NO INHERIT earth;
Where are you reading that?
regards, tom lane
---(end of broadcast)--
I notice that we have two versions of not INHERITing:
ALTER ROLE meek NOINHERIT earth;
ALTER TABLE meek NO INHERIT earth;
Is there some merit in deciding on just one of these syntaxes? It seems
like we will have to support both the above, but we should encourage
just one common way, just for san
