Following up to the discussion a few weeks ago and in accordance with the
criteria developed there about how a message should be classified NOTICE
or WARNING, I have identified the following cases that ought to be
reclassified:
change WARNING to NOTICE:
table "%s" has no indexes [during REINDEX]
change NOTICE to WARNING:
changing return type of function %s from "opaque" to xxx
INTERVAL(%d) precision reduced to maximum allowed, %d
I also thought that
copyObject() failed to produce an equal parse tree
should be made an elog() because it's an internal error.
Objections?
--
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
