Tom Lane wrote:
> "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I thought it was a case of Bruce not having time to work on them, because he
> > was too busy doing patch application and stuff.
>
> Bruce would probably be the right person to opine on this, but my
> impression is that pa
Tom Lane wrote:
> "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I thought it was a case of Bruce not having time to work on them, because he
> > was too busy doing patch application and stuff.
>
> Bruce would probably be the right person to opine on this, but my
> impression is that pa
"Christopher Kings-Lynne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I thought it was a case of Bruce not having time to work on them, because he
> was too busy doing patch application and stuff.
Bruce would probably be the right person to opine on this, but my
impression is that patch application is just a ti
> committing a major patch isn't to difficult ... its getting the major
> patch created that is ... PITR and Win32 don't exist in v7.4 because no
> patch was submit'd, not because Bruce didn't have time to commit them ...
I thought it was a case of Bruce not having time to work on them, because he
committing a major patch isn't to difficult ... its getting the major
patch created that is ... PITR and Win32 don't exist in v7.4 because no
patch was submit'd, not because Bruce didn't have time to commit them ...
On Tue, 2 Sep 2003, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> Maybe to free up Bruce for
Maybe to free up Bruce for major patches (eg. PITR, etc.), we should promote
someone else to 'minor patch' committer?
Chris
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
joining column's d
