Re: [HACKERS] New compile warnings in CVS

2004-10-26 Thread Neil Conway
On Wed, 2004-10-27 at 03:57, Tom Lane wrote: > No doubt this is from the PG_TRY that Neil added a couple days ago. > I think he is going to take it out again in favor of using AllocateFile, > so ignore the warnings for now (they're obviously bogus anyway). Sorry, I didn't see those compile warning

Re: [HACKERS] New compile warnings in CVS

2004-10-26 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I just updated my CVS copy and am seeing four new warnings from > pgstat.c: > pgstat.c:2352: warning: variable `dbentry' might be clobbered by > `longjmp' or `vfork' > pgstat.c:2360: warning: variable `havebackends' might be clo

Re: [HACKERS] New compile warnings in CVS

2004-10-26 Thread Bruce Momjian
Bruce Momjian wrote: > I just updated my CVS copy and am seeing four new warnings from > pgstat.c: > > pgstat.c:2352: warning: variable `dbentry' might be clobbered by > `longjmp' or `vfork' > pgstat.c:2360: warning: variable `havebackends' might be clobbered by > `lo

[HACKERS] New compile warnings in CVS

2004-10-26 Thread Bruce Momjian
I just updated my CVS copy and am seeing four new warnings from pgstat.c: pgstat.c:2352: warning: variable `dbentry' might be clobbered by `longjmp' or `vfork' pgstat.c:2360: warning: variable `havebackends' might be clobbered by `longjmp' or `vfork'