Re: [HACKERS] New pg_dump patch -- document statistics collector exception (REVISED PATCH)

Josh Berkus wrote: > Euler Taveira de Oliveira wrote: > > Bryce Nesbitt escreveu: > >> Here's a revision (thanks Robert Treat for the spelling corrextion). > >> If there are no other objections, how do I nominate it for consideration? > >> > > Added to next commit fest [1]. > > Um, not necessary.

Re: [HACKERS] New pg_dump patch -- document statistics collector exception (REVISED PATCH)

Euler Taveira de Oliveira wrote: Bryce Nesbitt escreveu: Here's a revision (thanks Robert Treat for the spelling corrextion). If there are no other objections, how do I nominate it for consideration? Added to next commit fest [1]. Um, not necessary. We're still accepting new doc patches, an

Re: [HACKERS] New pg_dump patch -- document statistics collector exception (REVISED PATCH)

Bryce Nesbitt escreveu: > Here's a revision (thanks Robert Treat for the spelling corrextion). > If there are no other objections, how do I nominate it for consideration? > Added to next commit fest [1]. [1] http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/CommitFest_2009-First -- Euler Taveira de Oliveira

Re: [HACKERS] New pg_dump patch -- document statistics collector exception (REVISED PATCH)

Bryce Nesbitt wrote: Here's a revision (thanks Robert Treat for the spelling corrextion). If there are no other objections, how do I nominate it for consideration? -Bryce You already have. Mind you, in the future when you're not continuing a discussion from a code patch, you

Re: [HACKERS] New pg_dump patch -- document statistics collector exception (REVISED PATCH)

Here's a revision (thanks Robert Treat for the spelling corrextion). If there are no other objections, how do I nominate it for consideration? -Bryce Index: pg_dump.sgml === RCS file: /projects/cvsroot/pgsql/doc/src/