On 1/12/07, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 02:35:13PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I caught this thread about O_DIRECT on kerneltrap.org:
> http://kerneltrap.org/node/7563
>
> It sounds like there is much to be gained here in terms of reducing
> the number of user/ke
On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 02:35:13PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I caught this thread about O_DIRECT on kerneltrap.org:
> http://kerneltrap.org/node/7563
>
> It sounds like there is much to be gained here in terms of reducing
> the number of user/kernel space copies in the operating system.
I caught this thread about O_DIRECT on kerneltrap.org:
http://kerneltrap.org/node/7563
It sounds like there is much to be gained here in terms of reducing
the number of user/kernel space copies in the operating system. I got
the impression that posix_fadvise in the Linux kernel isn't as good as
