Re: [HACKERS] Obsolete comment in tidpath.c

2015-10-06 Thread Etsuro Fujita
On 2015/10/07 7:01, Tom Lane wrote: > Robert Haas writes: >> On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 3:05 AM, Etsuro Fujita >> wrote: >>> I think "best_inner_indexscan()" in the following comment in tidpath.c >>> is obsolete. >>> >>> * There is currently no special support for joins involving CTID; in >>> * parti

Re: [HACKERS] Obsolete comment in tidpath.c

2015-10-06 Thread Tom Lane
Robert Haas writes: > On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 3:05 AM, Etsuro Fujita > wrote: >> I think "best_inner_indexscan()" in the following comment in tidpath.c >> is obsolete. >> >> * There is currently no special support for joins involving CTID; in >> * particular nothing corresponding to best_inner_in

Re: [HACKERS] Obsolete comment in tidpath.c

2015-10-06 Thread Robert Haas
On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 3:05 AM, Etsuro Fujita wrote: > I think "best_inner_indexscan()" in the following comment in tidpath.c > is obsolete. > > * There is currently no special support for joins involving CTID; in > * particular nothing corresponding to best_inner_indexscan(). Since it's > * n

[HACKERS] Obsolete comment in tidpath.c

2015-10-05 Thread Etsuro Fujita
I think "best_inner_indexscan()" in the following comment in tidpath.c is obsolete. * There is currently no special support for joins involving CTID; in * particular nothing corresponding to best_inner_indexscan(). Since it's * not very useful to store TIDs of one table in another table, there