On Mon, 2006-09-18 at 14:23 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Am Montag, 18. September 2006 13:50 schrieb Gevik Babakhani:
> > It was
>
> My question was, "Could you do this using a domain?". The possible answers
> to
> that are "Yes" and "No", neither of which appears below, nor does "domain".
Am Montag, 18. September 2006 13:50 schrieb Gevik Babakhani:
> It was
My question was, "Could you do this using a domain?". The possible answers to
that are "Yes" and "No", neither of which appears below, nor does "domain".
> Gevik Babakhani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I was wondering if I
It was
Gevik Babakhani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I was wondering if I should go ahead and add a macro datatype like the
> SERIAL, only this time for the uuid.
This assumes a fact not in evidence, which is that we're going to accept
a uuid-generation function as part of core. AFAIK the only r
Am Montag, 18. September 2006 13:28 schrieb Gevik Babakhani:
> > Could you do this using a domain?
>
> Tom had a very good point about this.
And that point was?
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
---(end of broadcast)---
On Mon, 2006-09-18 at 13:20 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 17. September 2006 01:47 schrieb Gevik Babakhani:
> > The development of the uuid datatype is yet in progress...
> > I was wondering if I should go ahead and add a macro datatype like the
> > SERIAL, only this time for the uui
Am Sonntag, 17. September 2006 01:47 schrieb Gevik Babakhani:
> The development of the uuid datatype is yet in progress...
> I was wondering if I should go ahead and add a macro datatype like the
> SERIAL, only this time for the uuid.
Could you do this using a domain?
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://
Understood, Thank you :)
On Sat, 2006-09-16 at 21:23 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Gevik Babakhani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I was wondering if I should go ahead and add a macro datatype like the
> > SERIAL, only this time for the uuid.
>
> This assumes a fact not in evidence, which is that we'r
Gevik Babakhani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I was wondering if I should go ahead and add a macro datatype like the
> SERIAL, only this time for the uuid.
This assumes a fact not in evidence, which is that we're going to accept
a uuid-generation function as part of core. AFAIK the only reasonabl
The development of the uuid datatype is yet in progress...
I was wondering if I should go ahead and add a macro datatype like the
SERIAL, only this time for the uuid.
something like:
create table tbl
(
mypk SERIALGUID;
)
which creates
create table tbl
(
mypk uuid default new_guid
