On Oct 28, 2007, at 2:54 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
I'd actually be curious what incremental changes you could see
making to
PostgreSQL for better in-memory operation. Ideas?
It would be difficult to make PostgreSQL really competitive for in-
memory operation, primarily because a contrary ass
J.,
I'd actually be curious what incremental changes you could see making to
PostgreSQL for better in-memory operation. Ideas?
--
--Josh
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL @ Sun
San Francisco
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
On Oct 27, 2007, at 2:20 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
* J. Andrew Rogers:
Everything you are looking for is here:
http://web.mit.edu/dna/www/vldb07hstore.pdf
It is the latest Stonebraker et al on massively distributed in-memory
OLTP architectures.
"Ruby-on-Rails compiles into standard JDBC, b
* J. Andrew Rogers:
> Everything you are looking for is here:
>
> http://web.mit.edu/dna/www/vldb07hstore.pdf
>
> It is the latest Stonebraker et al on massively distributed in-memory
> OLTP architectures.
"Ruby-on-Rails compiles into standard JDBC, but hides all the complexity
of that interface.
On Oct 25, 2007, at 8:05 AM, Dan wrote:
In looking at current developments in computers, it seems we're
nearing
a point where a fundamental change may be possible in databases...
Namely in-memory databases which could lead to huge performance
improvements.
...
The sites that use it see incredi
On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 08:05:24AM -0700, Dan wrote:
> In looking at current developments in computers, it seems we're nearing
> a point where a fundamental change may be possible in databases...
> Namely in-memory databases which could lead to huge performance
> improvements.
I think there are a
I'd suggest looking at the source code to several of the in-memory
databases which already exist.
On 10/25/07, Dan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
>
> In looking at current developments in computers, it seems we're nearing
> a point where a fundamental change may be possible in databases...
> Name
Hi
In looking at current developments in computers, it seems we're nearing
a point where a fundamental change may be possible in databases...
Namely in-memory databases which could lead to huge performance
improvements.
A good starting point is to look at memcached, since it provides proof
that i
