Regarding the patch listed on the commitfest 3 new functions into intarray
and intagg (which I just noticed has a reviewer listed -- doh):
http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I definitely like the int_array_append_aggregate function but I don't see
anything int[]
Hi,
Gregory Stark wrote:
Regarding the patch listed on the commitfest 3 new functions into intarray
and intagg (which I just noticed has a reviewer listed -- doh):
..well, just add your name as well, no?
I definitely like the int_array_append_aggregate function but I don't see
anything
Markus Wanner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
Gregory Stark wrote:
Regarding the patch listed on the commitfest 3 new functions into intarray
and intagg (which I just noticed has a reviewer listed -- doh):
..well, just add your name as well, no?
Yeah, people should feel free to comment on
Hi,
Gregory Stark wrote:
The naming 'bidx' seems a bit weired to me, but otherwise I'm also optimistic
about it.
If we wanted to put that in core
Uh.. ATM it's just a patch against contrib. I don't think 'bidx' needs
to go into core. Otherwise we'd have to move the whole intarr contrib
Hi,
Gregory Stark wrote:
I definitely like the int_array_append_aggregate function but I don't see
anything int[] specific about it. We should be able to have a generic
array_union() aggregate which uses the same IsA(fcinfo-context, AggState)
trick to scribble on its state variable. It don't
Dmitry Koterov napsal(a):
Hello.
Here are these functions with detailed documentation:
http://en.dklab.ru/lib/dklab_postgresql_patch/
Added to next commit fest patch list.
Zdenek
--
Zdenek Kotala Sun Microsystems
Prague, Czech Republic http://sun.com/postgresql
--
Hello.
Here are these functions with detailed documentation:
http://en.dklab.ru/lib/dklab_postgresql_patch/
intagg.int_array_append_aggregate(int[]): fast merge arrays into one large
list
intarray._int_group_count_sort(int[], bool): frequency-based sorting
intarray.bidx(int[], int): binary
