Re: [HACKERS] Patch for option in pg_resetxlog for restore from WAL files

2012-09-25 Thread Amit Kapila
On Tuesday, September 25, 2012 6:27 PM Simon Riggs wrote : > On 24 September 2012 04:00, Heikki Linnakangas > wrote: > > On 18.07.2012 16:47, Amit kapila wrote: > >> > >> Patch implementing the design in below mail chain is attached with > this > >> mail. > > > > > > This patch copies the ReadReco

Re: [HACKERS] Patch for option in pg_resetxlog for restore from WAL files

2012-09-25 Thread Simon Riggs
On 24 September 2012 04:00, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > On 18.07.2012 16:47, Amit kapila wrote: >> >> Patch implementing the design in below mail chain is attached with this >> mail. > > > This patch copies the ReadRecord() function and a bunch of related functions > from xlog.c into pg_resetxlog.

Re: [HACKERS] Patch for option in pg_resetxlog for restore from WAL files

2012-09-24 Thread Amit Kapila
> On Monday, September 24, 2012 2:30 PM Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > On 18.07.2012 16:47, Amit kapila wrote: > > Patch implementing the design in below mail chain is attached with > this mail. > > This patch copies the ReadRecord() function and a bunch of related > functions from xlog.c into pg_res

Re: [HACKERS] Patch for option in pg_resetxlog for restore from WAL files

2012-09-24 Thread Heikki Linnakangas
On 18.07.2012 16:47, Amit kapila wrote: Patch implementing the design in below mail chain is attached with this mail. This patch copies the ReadRecord() function and a bunch of related functions from xlog.c into pg_resetxlog.c. There's a separate patch in the current commitfest to make that c