On 15-10-2013 14:34, Josh Berkus wrote:
On 10/15/2013 07:36 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com
wrote:
Josh said we should treat replication connections in a separate pool
from normal database connections, right? So you withdraw your
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 8:57 AM, Amit Kapila amit.kapil...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 4:30 AM, Gibheer gibh...@zero-knowledge.org wrote:
On Mon, 14 Oct 2013 11:52:57 +0530
Amit Kapila amit.kapil...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Gibheer
On Sat, 19 Oct 2013 12:09:57 +0530
Amit Kapila amit.kapil...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 8:57 AM, Amit Kapila
amit.kapil...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 4:30 AM, Gibheer
gibh...@zero-knowledge.org wrote:
On Mon, 14 Oct 2013 11:52:57 +0530
Amit Kapila
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 1:26 AM, Gibheer gibh...@zero-knowledge.org wrote:
On Sat, 19 Oct 2013 12:09:57 +0530
Amit Kapila amit.kapil...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 8:57 AM, Amit Kapila
amit.kapil...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 4:30 AM, Gibheer
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 4:30 AM, Gibheer gibh...@zero-knowledge.org wrote:
On Mon, 14 Oct 2013 11:52:57 +0530
Amit Kapila amit.kapil...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Gibheer gibh...@zero-knowledge.org
wrote:
On Sun, 13 Oct 2013 11:38:17 +0530
Amit Kapila
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 12:13 AM, Amit Kapila amit.kapil...@gmail.com wrote:
If we think this way, then may be we should have max_user_connections
instead of max_connections and then max_wal_connections. But still
there are other's like pg_basebackup who needs connections and
tomorrow there
On 2013-10-15 10:29:58 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 12:13 AM, Amit Kapila amit.kapil...@gmail.com wrote:
If we think this way, then may be we should have max_user_connections
instead of max_connections and then max_wal_connections. But still
there are other's like
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
But I also agree that making max_wal_senders act as both a minimum and
a maximum is no good. +1 to everything Josh Berkus said.
Josh said we should treat replication connections in a separate pool
from normal
On 2013-10-15 10:36:41 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com
wrote:
But I also agree that making max_wal_senders act as both a minimum and
a maximum is no good. +1 to everything Josh Berkus said.
Josh said we should treat
On 10/15/2013 07:36 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com
wrote:
Josh said we should treat replication connections in a separate pool
from normal database connections, right? So you withdraw your earlier
objection to that?
I don't
On Mon, 14 Oct 2013 11:52:57 +0530
Amit Kapila amit.kapil...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Gibheer gibh...@zero-knowledge.org
wrote:
On Sun, 13 Oct 2013 11:38:17 +0530
Amit Kapila amit.kapil...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 3:17 AM, Gibheer
On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Gibheer gibh...@zero-knowledge.org wrote:
On Sun, 13 Oct 2013 11:38:17 +0530
Amit Kapila amit.kapil...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 3:17 AM, Gibheer gibh...@zero-knowledge.org
wrote:
On Mon, 7 Oct 2013 11:39:55 +0530
Amit Kapila
On 10/13/2013 01:38 AM, Gibheer wrote:
So it will ensure that max_wal_senders is used for reserving
connection slots from being used by non-super user connections. I find
new usage of max_wal_senders acceptable, if anyone else thinks
otherwise, please let us know.
I think otherwise.
Changing
On 2013-10-14 10:26:25 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
On 10/13/2013 01:38 AM, Gibheer wrote:
So it will ensure that max_wal_senders is used for reserving
connection slots from being used by non-super user connections. I find
new usage of max_wal_senders acceptable, if anyone else thinks
On 10/14/2013 10:51 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
Imo the complications around this prove my (way earlier) point that it'd
be much better to treat replication connections as something entirely
different to normal SQL connections. There's really not much overlap
here and while there's some
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 10:56 PM, Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com wrote:
On 10/13/2013 01:38 AM, Gibheer wrote:
So it will ensure that max_wal_senders is used for reserving
connection slots from being used by non-super user connections. I find
new usage of max_wal_senders acceptable, if anyone
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 11:21 PM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On 2013-10-14 10:26:25 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
On 10/13/2013 01:38 AM, Gibheer wrote:
So it will ensure that max_wal_senders is used for reserving
connection slots from being used by non-super user connections. I
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 3:17 AM, Gibheer gibh...@zero-knowledge.org wrote:
On Mon, 7 Oct 2013 11:39:55 +0530
Amit Kapila amit.kapil...@gmail.com wrote:
Robert Haas wrote:
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 2:04 AM, Andres Freund
andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com wrote:
Hmm. It seems like this match is
On Sun, 13 Oct 2013 11:38:17 +0530
Amit Kapila amit.kapil...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 3:17 AM, Gibheer gibh...@zero-knowledge.org
wrote:
On Mon, 7 Oct 2013 11:39:55 +0530
Amit Kapila amit.kapil...@gmail.com wrote:
Robert Haas wrote:
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 2:04 AM, Andres
On Fri, 11 Oct 2013 10:00:51 +0530
Amit Kapila amit.kapil...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 10:06 PM, Gibheer
gibh...@zero-knowledge.org wrote:
On Thu, 10 Oct 2013 09:55:24 +0530
Amit Kapila amit.kapil...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 3:17 AM, Gibheer
I'd received an email from Gibheer suggesting it be move due to lack of time to
work on it. I can certainly move it back if that's no longer the case.
On Oct 9, 2013, at 23:25, Amit Kapila amit.kapil...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 3:17 AM, Gibheer gibh...@zero-knowledge.org
On Thu, 10 Oct 2013 09:55:24 +0530
Amit Kapila amit.kapil...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 3:17 AM, Gibheer gibh...@zero-knowledge.org
wrote:
On Mon, 7 Oct 2013 11:39:55 +0530
Amit Kapila amit.kapil...@gmail.com wrote:
Robert Haas wrote:
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 2:04 AM, Andres
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 10:06 PM, Gibheer gibh...@zero-knowledge.org wrote:
On Thu, 10 Oct 2013 09:55:24 +0530
Amit Kapila amit.kapil...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 3:17 AM, Gibheer gibh...@zero-knowledge.org
wrote:
On Mon, 7 Oct 2013 11:39:55 +0530
Amit Kapila
On Mon, 7 Oct 2013 11:39:55 +0530
Amit Kapila amit.kapil...@gmail.com wrote:
Robert Haas wrote:
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 2:04 AM, Andres Freund
andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com wrote:
Hmm. It seems like this match is making MaxConnections no longer
mean the maximum number of connections, but
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 3:17 AM, Gibheer gibh...@zero-knowledge.org wrote:
On Mon, 7 Oct 2013 11:39:55 +0530
Amit Kapila amit.kapil...@gmail.com wrote:
Robert Haas wrote:
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 2:04 AM, Andres Freund
andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com wrote:
Hmm. It seems like this match is
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 2:04 AM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
Hmm. It seems like this match is making MaxConnections no longer mean
the maximum number of connections, but rather the maximum number of
non-replication connections. I don't think I support that
definitional change,
On 2013-08-02 08:16:15 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 3:10 AM, Gibheer gibh...@zero-knowledge.org wrote:
here is an update off my patch based on the discussion with Marko
Tiikkaja and Andres Freund.
Marko and I had the idea of introducing reserved connections based on
On Fri, 2 Aug 2013 08:16:15 -0400
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 3:10 AM, Gibheer gibh...@zero-knowledge.org
wrote:
here is an update off my patch based on the discussion with Marko
Tiikkaja and Andres Freund.
Marko and I had the idea of introducing
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 3:10 AM, Gibheer gibh...@zero-knowledge.org wrote:
here is an update off my patch based on the discussion with Marko
Tiikkaja and Andres Freund.
Marko and I had the idea of introducing reserved connections based on
roles as it would create a way to garantuee specific
Hi,
here is an update off my patch based on the discussion with Marko
Tiikkaja and Andres Freund.
Marko and I had the idea of introducing reserved connections based on
roles as it would create a way to garantuee specific roles to connect
when other roles use up all connections for whatever
Hi,
this patch introduces a new configuration flag
replication_reserved_connections to reserve connection slots for
replication in the same way superuser_reserved_connections works for
superusers.
This helps in cases where the application opens connections until
max_connections is reached. A
31 matches
Mail list logo
