Yes, there should be permission checking - I'll add it
later (in 7.1) if no one else.
Should be simple enough. Is this okay:
I think yes - please apply.
Vadim
Actually, I think a more interesting question is "should CHECKPOINT
have permission restrictions? If so, what should they be?"
A quite relevant precedent is that Unix systems (at least the ones
I've used) do not restrict who can call sync().
Checkpoints 1. affect entire system, 2.
Tom Lane wrote:
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Mikheev, Vadim writes:
Yes, there should be permission checking - I'll add it later (in 7.1)
if no one else.
Should be simple enough. Is this okay:
Actually, I think a more interesting question is "should
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
What about DoS attacks? What would be the effect of
someone's setting off an infinite loop of CHECKPOINTs?
Don't we have bigger DoS attacks? Certainly SELECT cash_out(1) is a
much bigger one.
I've missed point - cash_out(1) is
Okay, okay, complaint withdrawn. Peter, would you commit that
permission check?
regards, tom lane
Mikheev, Vadim writes:
Yes, there should be permission checking - I'll add it later (in 7.1)
if no one else.
Should be simple enough. Is this okay:
Index: utility.c
===
RCS file:
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Mikheev, Vadim writes:
Yes, there should be permission checking - I'll add it later (in 7.1)
if no one else.
Should be simple enough. Is this okay:
Actually, I think a more interesting question is "should CHECKPOINT
have permission restrictions?
Tom Lane wrote:
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Mikheev, Vadim writes:
Yes, there should be permission checking - I'll add it later (in 7.1)
if no one else.
Should be simple enough. Is this okay:
Actually, I think a more interesting question is "should CHECKPOINT
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Contrary to what the submitted documentation claims, there is no
permission checking done on the CHECKPOINT command. Should there be?
Vadim seemed to indicate that he was going to make that restriction.
Perhaps I misunderstood.
If it's too late to make the change
Contrary to what the submitted documentation claims, there is no
permission checking done on the CHECKPOINT command.
Should there be?
Vadim seemed to indicate that he was going to make that restriction.
Perhaps I misunderstood.
Yes, there should be permission checking - I'll add
10 matches
Mail list logo
