On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 12:00:20AM -0400, nik9...@gmail.com wrote:
I've always used -1-f - file.sql. It is confusing that -1 doesn't warn you
when it wont work though.
This will be fixed in 9.3 with this commit:
commit be690e291d59e8d0c9f4df59abe09f1ff6cc0da9
Author: Robert
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 3:47 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 3:07 AM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
Personally, I'd have no problem with flat-out dropping (not demoting)
both of those two specific messages. I seem to recall that Bruce has
lobbied
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 02:15:43AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
There might be something to the idea of demoting a few of the things
we've traditionally had as NOTICEs, though. IME, the following two
messages account for a huge percentage of the chatter:
On tis, 2012-06-19 at 02:15 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
There might be something to the idea of demoting a few of the things
we've traditionally had as NOTICEs, though. IME, the following two
messages account for a huge percentage of the chatter:
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 11:25 AM, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
I don't like these messages any more than the next guy, but why drop
only those, and not any of the other NOTICE-level messages? The meaning
of NOTICE is pretty much, if this is the first time you're using
PostgreSQL,
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
There might be something to the idea of demoting a few of the things
we've traditionally had as NOTICEs, though. IME, the following two
messages account for a huge percentage of the chatter:
NOTICE: CREATE TABLE will create implicit sequence
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 09:30:14PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
There might be something to the idea of demoting a few of the things
we've traditionally had as NOTICEs, though. IME, the following two
messages account for a huge percentage of the chatter:
NOTICE: CREATE TABLE will create
There might be something to the idea of demoting a few of the things
we've traditionally had as NOTICEs, though. IME, the following two
messages account for a huge percentage of the chatter:
NOTICE: CREATE TABLE will create implicit sequence foo_a_seq for
serial column foo.a
NOTICE: CREATE
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 2:15 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
There might be something to the idea of demoting a few of the things
we've traditionally had as NOTICEs, though. IME, the following two
messages account for a huge percentage of the
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 2:56 PM, Fabien COELHO coe...@cri.ensmp.fr wrote:
The argument for defaulting to NOTICE is the same as it's always been:
that those messages are really intended for novices, and a pretty good
definition of a novice is somebody who doesn't know how to (or that he
should)
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 9:00 PM, nik9...@gmail.com wrote:
I've always used -1-f - file.sql. It is confusing that -1 doesn't warn you
when it wont work though.
Yeah, I just got bitten by that one. Definitely violates the POLA.
Cheers,
Jeff
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list
Hello pgdev,
(Second attempt)
I've conducted a statistical study about PostgreSQL use in OSS. One of the
result is that quite a few projects have errors in their SQL setup scripts
which lead to some statements to be ignored, typically somme ADD
CONSTRAINTS which do not change the database
Fabien COELHO coe...@cri.ensmp.fr writes:
[ errors in SQL scripts fed to psql are easily missed ]
So I would suggest the following todos:
1 - change the default verbosity to warning.
The argument for defaulting to NOTICE is the same as it's always been:
that those messages are really intended
Hello Tom,
thanks for your answer.
So I would suggest the following todos:
1 - change the default verbosity to warning.
The argument for defaulting to NOTICE is the same as it's always been:
that those messages are really intended for novices, and a pretty good
definition of a novice is
I've always used -1-f - file.sql. It is confusing that -1 doesn't warn you
when it wont work though.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 16, 2012, at 3:42 AM, Fabien COELHO coe...@cri.ensmp.fr wrote:
Hello pgdev,
(Second attempt)
I've conducted a statistical study about PostgreSQL use in
15 matches
Mail list logo
