Hannu Krosing wrote:
On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 22:37 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
If you mean that we're duplicating the effort that's already going
elsewhere, my opinion is yes, we are.
duplicating the effort is not always a bad thing. I was mostly
suggesting to watch discussions and dig
On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 22:37 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Hannu Krosing wrote:
On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 15:18 -0700, Joshua Drake wrote:
The two obvious problems with the existing MCP architecture is:
1. Single point of failure
For async replication there is always SPoF, at least
On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 22:16 -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Hannu Krosing wrote:
On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 15:18 -0700, Joshua Drake wrote:
Will there be an helper application for setting up and configuring
changes in replication. or will it all be done using added SQL
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 12:02:20PM +0200, Hannu Krosing wrote:
A good goal. But why would anybody _need_ 50 slaves ?
They might have a contractual responsibility for extremely wide
geographic distribution. Or they might be building an application
that needs extremely wide network-topological
On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 12:02 +0200, Hannu Krosing wrote:
On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 22:16 -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Case in point. To replicate a table currently you do this:
ALTER TABLE foo ENABLE REPLICATION;
ALTER TABLE foo ENABLE REPLICATION ON SLAVE 0;
How
On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 09:54 +0200, Hannu Krosing wrote:
On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 22:37 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Hannu Krosing wrote:
On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 15:18 -0700, Joshua Drake wrote:
it was in subsection mcp_server mysteriously dies
On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 09:01 -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 12:02 +0200, Hannu Krosing wrote:
On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 22:16 -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Case in point. To replicate a table currently you do this:
ALTER TABLE foo ENABLE
On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 19:15 +0200, Hannu Krosing wrote:
SLAVE 0 is defined by a GUC on the slave, replication_slave_no I think.
( I would have to check the docs)
And the only other GUC slave needs for replication is MCP/Slave connect
info ?
On Mon, 2008-10-27 at 13:42 -0700, Joshua Drake wrote:
With the recent open sourcing of Replicator, the team has been trying
to come up with ways to ensure an open development process. In that
light we have decided to have our first release 1.9 meeting on
Freenode. All people interested in
On Tue, 28 Oct 2008 19:46:42 +0200
Hannu Krosing [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2008-10-27 at 13:42 -0700, Joshua Drake wrote:
With the recent open sourcing of Replicator, the team has been
trying to come up with ways to ensure an open development process.
In that light we have decided
On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 19:46 +0200, Hannu Krosing wrote:
* Is there a mailing list for replicator ?
https://lists.commandprompt.com/mailman/listinfo/replicator-general
Regards,
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ, RHCE
devrim~gunduz.org, devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr
On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 11:01 -0700, Joshua Drake wrote:
On Tue, 28 Oct 2008 19:46:42 +0200
Hannu Krosing [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2008-10-27 at 13:42 -0700, Joshua Drake wrote:
With the recent open sourcing of Replicator, the team has been
trying to come up with ways to ensure
On Tue, 28 Oct 2008 19:46:42 +0200
Hannu Krosing [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The current topics are:
* New MCP architecture
What's new ?
I have some doubts about the current architecture based on my reading
of replicator wiki, but would like to learn about the new
architecture
On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 15:18 -0700, Joshua Drake wrote:
On Tue, 28 Oct 2008 19:46:42 +0200
Hannu Krosing [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The current topics are:
* New MCP architecture
What's new ?
I have some doubts about the current architecture based on my reading
of
Hannu Krosing wrote:
On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 15:18 -0700, Joshua Drake wrote:
The two obvious problems with the existing MCP architecture is:
1. Single point of failure
For async replication there is always SPoF, at least the master until
first slave has aquired log is a SPoF, or do
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Hannu Krosing wrote:
On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 15:18 -0700, Joshua Drake wrote:
Will there be an helper application for setting up and configuring
changes in replication. or will it all be done using added SQL
commands ?
Well, the interface I work on is all SQL commands
With the recent open sourcing of Replicator, the team has been trying
to come up with ways to ensure an open development process. In that
light we have decided to have our first release 1.9 meeting on
Freenode. All people interested in participating in a discussion about
the upcoming Replicator
17 matches
Mail list logo
