Already applied by Tom. Thanks.
---
Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 12:34:19PM +0900, Kenji Sugita wrote:
From: Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 7.4devel - LOG: PGSTAT
at 12:34:19PM +0900, Kenji Sugita wrote:
From: Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 7.4devel - LOG: PGSTAT: socket() failed: Invalid
argument
Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2003 18:44:35 +0200
;;; On Sun, Jul 06, 2003 at 06:30:04PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
;;; Try
Hello,
On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 12:55:06AM +0900, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When hints.ai_family is PF_UNSPEC, getaddrinfo() returns two entries,
first one being IPv6 one, and the second one is IPv4 one, even if
IPv6 support is not compiled in the kernel(this is true at least on
my
From: Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 7.4devel - LOG: PGSTAT: socket() failed: Invalid
argument
Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2003 18:44:35 +0200
;;; On Sun, Jul 06, 2003 at 06:30:04PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
;;; Try the attached patch instead.
;;;
;;; Oops, that one
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 12:34:19PM +0900, Kenji Sugita wrote:
From: Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 7.4devel - LOG: PGSTAT: socket() failed: Invalid
argument
Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2003 18:44:35 +0200
;;; On Sun, Jul 06, 2003 at 06:30:04PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote
From: Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 7.4devel - LOG: PGSTAT: socket() failed:
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2003 22:25:44 +0200
;;; ;;; On Sun, Jul 06, 2003 at 06:30:04PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
;;; ;;; Try the attached patch instead.
;;; ;;;
;;; ;;; Oops, that one
From: Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 7.4devel - LOG: PGSTAT: socket() failed: Invalid
argument
Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2003 18:44:35 +0200
;;; On Sun, Jul 06, 2003 at 06:30:04PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
;;; Try the attached patch instead.
;;;
;;; Oops, that one
On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 12:38:57AM +0900, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 03:49:19PM +0900, Kenji Sugita wrote:
It seems that a value of addr-ai_socktype returned by getaddrinfo in
pg_stat.c is not SOCK_DGRAM.
Please try the following untested patch:
No, please
On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 12:38:57AM +0900, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 03:49:19PM +0900, Kenji Sugita wrote:
It seems that a value of addr-ai_socktype returned by getaddrinfo in
pg_stat.c is not SOCK_DGRAM.
Please try the following untested patch:
[...]
+ for (;
On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 12:55:06AM +0900, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When hints.ai_family is PF_UNSPEC, getaddrinfo() returns two entries,
first one being IPv6 one, and the second one is IPv4 one, even if
IPv6 support is not compiled in the kernel(this is true at least on
my FreeBSD box).
And
On Sun, Jul 06, 2003 at 06:30:04PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
Try the attached patch instead.
Oops, that one was a little broken. I change it.
Try the attached one instead.
Kurt
Index: ./src/backend/postmaster/pgstat.c
===
RCS
On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 10:44:31AM +0900, Kenji Sugita wrote:
From: Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Kenji Sugita [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2003 19:20:11 +0200
;;; What system are you running on, and does it have a getaddrinfo()
;;; or not?
Red Hat
It seems that a value of addr-ai_socktype returned by getaddrinfo in
pg_stat.c is not SOCK_DGRAM.
Kenji Sugita
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
I don't see any pg_stat.c in the source tree. Can you show us the exact
line, and perhaps the failure.
---
Kenji Sugita wrote:
It seems that a value of addr-ai_socktype returned by getaddrinfo in
pg_stat.c is not
On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 10:06:54AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
I don't see any pg_stat.c in the source tree. Can you show us the exact
line, and perhaps the failure.
He means pgstat.c of course.
Kurt
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: you can
On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 03:49:19PM +0900, Kenji Sugita wrote:
It seems that a value of addr-ai_socktype returned by getaddrinfo in
pg_stat.c is not SOCK_DGRAM.
What system are you running on, and does it have a getaddrinfo()
or not?
If I tell getaddrinfo() it should return a SOCK_DGRAM, it can
On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 03:49:19PM +0900, Kenji Sugita wrote:
It seems that a value of addr-ai_socktype returned by getaddrinfo in
pg_stat.c is not SOCK_DGRAM.
What do you base this on?
My guess is that it returns an ipv6 address while you do not have
IPv6 support in the kernel. If that is
On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 08:35:00PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 03:49:19PM +0900, Kenji Sugita wrote:
It seems that a value of addr-ai_socktype returned by getaddrinfo in
pg_stat.c is not SOCK_DGRAM.
What do you base this on?
My guess is that it returns an ipv6
startup_failed;
}
From: Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 7.4devel - LOG: PGSTAT: socket() failed: Invalid
argument
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2003 20:52:00 +0200
;;; On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 08:35:00PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
;;; On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 03:49:19PM
19 matches
Mail list logo
