Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 8.0.3 and Ipv6

2005-08-22 Thread Petr Jelinek
Andrew Dunstan wrote: Can someone please try running a build from CVS tip made on a modern box (W2k3 or XP >= SP1 I believe) on a non-modern box (e.g. W2k) and see if anything blows up? If it does then we either have to finish this work now or revert the config file changes, I think. W2k and

Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 8.0.3 and Ipv6

2005-08-21 Thread Andrew Dunstan
Tom Lane wrote: Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: I am bit worried about those HAVE_IPV6 ifdefs - they will prolly have to be modified to C code under windows Now I consider it you might be right. Here's a list of those places: [lots] You should not have to tou

Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 8.0.3 and Ipv6

2005-08-21 Thread Tom Lane
Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The one place that very slightly bothers me is the ::1 line in > pg_hba.conf. The fact that it comes last in the default config is its > saving grace - it won't ever be reached by a passing connection. I think > at least, though, we should put a warn

Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 8.0.3 and Ipv6

2005-08-21 Thread Tom Lane
Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> I am bit worried about those HAVE_IPV6 ifdefs - they will prolly have >> to be modified to C code under windows > Now I consider it you might be right. Here's a list of those places: > [lots] You should not have to touch the HAVE_IPV6 code --- if you

Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 8.0.3 and Ipv6

2005-08-21 Thread Andrew Dunstan
[adding -hackers to discussion] [getaddrinfo and friends are broken on some versions of windows] Maggnus Hagander wrote: That definitly means it's broken. We need the same binary to run wether you have it or not - at least if we want it to be included in the precompiled binaries by the inst