Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 5:41 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > It's my mailbox --- it is my time to decide when to look at it, or not.
>
> Absolutely.
>
> > There is nothing private about its contents.
>
> Understood.
>
> > You can do whatever you want with the release schedule.
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 5:41 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> It's my mailbox --- it is my time to decide when to look at it, or not.
Absolutely.
> There is nothing private about its contents.
Understood.
> You can do whatever you want with the release schedule.
I should be so lucky. :-)
I'm sorry
Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 4:03 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Josh Berkus wrote:
> >> Bruce,
> >>
> >> Have you looked at this? ?Are there no other Open Items?
> >
> > I have 2k emails that I need to go through to see what I have kept as
> > open. ?I am working on pg_migrator stuff
On tor, 2010-01-07 at 17:18 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 4:03 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Josh Berkus wrote:
> >> Bruce,
> >>
> >> Have you looked at this? Are there no other Open Items?
> >
> > I have 2k emails that I need to go through to see what I have kept as
> > open.
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 4:03 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Josh Berkus wrote:
>> Bruce,
>>
>> Have you looked at this? Are there no other Open Items?
>
> I have 2k emails that I need to go through to see what I have kept as
> open. I am working on pg_migrator stuff at the moment.
I am totally confu
Josh Berkus wrote:
> Bruce,
>
> Have you looked at this? Are there no other Open Items?
I have 2k emails that I need to go through to see what I have kept as
open. I am working on pg_migrator stuff at the moment.
--
Bruce Momjian http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB
On Thursday 07 January 2010 20:58:10 Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> Robert Haas wrote:
> > Are there
> > really no other open issues for 8.5? That would be great, but I am
> > concerned that there may be other things that people just haven't
> > gotten around to mentioning yet.
>
> Well, there's sti
Robert Haas wrote:
> Are there
> really no other open issues for 8.5? That would be great, but I am
> concerned that there may be other things that people just haven't
> gotten around to mentioning yet.
Well, there's still a number of items on the Hot Standby TODO list.
https://wiki.postgresql.o
Bruce,
Have you looked at this? Are there no other Open Items?
--Josh
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 10:50 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 16:47, Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 25, 2009 at 3:09 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
>>> I'm not sure whether we ever posted this schedule anywhere official -
>>> if so, I can't find it - but my understanding is that we
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 16:47, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 25, 2009 at 3:09 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
>> I'm not sure whether we ever posted this schedule anywhere official -
>> if so, I can't find it - but my understanding is that we have
>> consensus on the release schedule described here:
>>
On Fri, Dec 25, 2009 at 3:09 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> I'm not sure whether we ever posted this schedule anywhere official -
> if so, I can't find it - but my understanding is that we have
> consensus on the release schedule described here:
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-09/m
I'm not sure whether we ever posted this schedule anywhere official -
if so, I can't find it - but my understanding is that we have
consensus on the release schedule described here:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-09/msg01251.php
Under this schedule, the last CommitFest for the
13 matches
Mail list logo
