[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andrew Sullivan) writes:
> It isn't clear to me why you think you need to do this: vacuum
> doesn't block your queries anyway. If the idea is that you have a
> table that you'd rather TRUNCATE and not have to vacuum, however,
> that makes sense. There are several strategies for
First, I'm moving this to -general, because this is way off topic for
-hackers as near as I can tell.
On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 10:39:18PM +0200, Dragan Zubac wrote:
> 1. Is it possible for multiply PostgreSQL instances (engines,cores) to use
> same DATA space?
No. In fact, this is a very good w
Hello
We're looking for HA PostgreSQL solution,so have a couple of questions:
1. Is it possible for multiply PostgreSQL instances (engines,cores) to
use same DATA space? For example,to have two PostgreSQL processes which
will use same data directory,same files,and same data ? So,if You
update som
