On Feb 24, 2006, at 13:25 , Gavin Sherry wrote:
On Feb 23, 2006, at 11:40 , Gavin Sherry wrote:
I do think that unit testing of areas such as data types would be
useful,
particularly the date/time code and arrays as I consider that area
of the
code quite fragile. I wouldn't expect the unit t
On Fri, 24 Feb 2006, Michael Glaesemann wrote:
> [I neglected to cc the list in my reply earlier. Apologies to Gavin
> for the double-post.]
>
> On Feb 23, 2006, at 11:40 , Gavin Sherry wrote:
>
>
> > I do think that unit testing of areas such as data types would be
> > useful,
> > particularly t
[I neglected to cc the list in my reply earlier. Apologies to Gavin
for the double-post.]
On Feb 23, 2006, at 11:40 , Gavin Sherry wrote:
I do think that unit testing of areas such as data types would be
useful,
particularly the date/time code and arrays as I consider that area
of the
c
On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 01:40:06PM +1100, Gavin Sherry wrote:
> I previously proposed integrating a unit test framework into PostgreSQL.
> Getting started wasn't much fun and I gave up. This is because unit
> testing is really suited to a functional programming model, IMHO. Testing
> the most compl
On Wed, 22 Feb 2006, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Robert Treat wrote:
>
> > You could check into what spikesource has been doing. I believe they mostly
> > just piggyback off of our regression tests for postgresql core, but there
> > might still be something that could be built upon. If you look at t
Robert Treat wrote:
> You could check into what spikesource has been doing. I believe they mostly
> just piggyback off of our regression tests for postgresql core, but there
> might still be something that could be built upon. If you look at this url
> http://developer.spikesource.com/spikewa
Michael Glaesemann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Something that has been briefly discussed in the past wrt PostgreSQL
> has been unit testing to complement the current regression tests.
I was and remain pretty dubious of this idea. In the backend in
particular, there is very little code that
On Wednesday 22 February 2006 01:27, Michael Glaesemann wrote:
> During Josh Berkus' presentation at the JPUG PostgreSQL Conference, I
> was particularly struck by the fact that 8.1 had a shorter beta
> period than previous releases, rolled out on time, and enjoyed a
> longer period before the firs
Lukas Smith wrote:
Michael Glaesemann wrote:
During Josh Berkus' presentation at the JPUG PostgreSQL Conference, I
was particularly struck by the fact that 8.1 had a shorter beta
period than previous releases, rolled out on time, and enjoyed a
longer period before the first post-release bu
Michael Glaesemann wrote:
During Josh Berkus' presentation at the JPUG PostgreSQL Conference, I
was particularly struck by the fact that 8.1 had a shorter beta period
than previous releases, rolled out on time, and enjoyed a longer period
before the first post-release bug was reported. The Post
During Josh Berkus' presentation at the JPUG PostgreSQL Conference, I
was particularly struck by the fact that 8.1 had a shorter beta
period than previous releases, rolled out on time, and enjoyed a
longer period before the first post-release bug was reported. The
PostgreSQL Build Farm play
11 matches
Mail list logo
