Marc Cousin escribió:
> On 20/03/2013 16:33, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> >Ah. The reason for this problem is that the statement start time (which
> >also sets the transaction start time, when it's the first statement) is
> >set by postgres.c, not the transaction-control functions in xact.c. So
> >yo
On Wed, 2013-03-20 at 13:13 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Marc Cousin escribió:
> > On 20/03/2013 16:33, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>
> > >Ah. The reason for this problem is that the statement start time (which
> > >also sets the transaction start time, when it's the first statement) is
> > >set by p
Marc Cousin escribió:
> On 20/03/2013 16:33, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> >Ah. The reason for this problem is that the statement start time (which
> >also sets the transaction start time, when it's the first statement) is
> >set by postgres.c, not the transaction-control functions in xact.c. So
> >yo
On 20/03/2013 16:33, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Marc Cousin escribió:
Hi,
I'm trying to write a background writer, and I'm facing a problem with
timestamps. The following code is where I'm having a problem (it's just a demo
for
the problem):
BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnection("test", NULL);
whil
Marc Cousin escribió:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to write a background writer, and I'm facing a problem with
> timestamps. The following code is where I'm having a problem (it's just a
> demo for
> the problem):
>
> BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnection("test", NULL);
> while (!got_sigterm)
> {
>
Hi,
I'm trying to write a background writer, and I'm facing a problem with
timestamps. The following code is where I'm having a problem (it's just a demo
for
the problem):
BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnection("test", NULL);
while (!got_sigterm)
{
int ret;
/* Wait 1s */
re
