On 03/05/16 16:35, Craig Ringer wrote:
On 3 May 2016 at 21:37, Merlin Moncure mailto:mmonc...@gmail.com>> wrote:
There is library out there, unfortunately GPL licensed, that attempts
to fully implement posix including fork(): http://midipix.org/. One
of these days I'd like to have
On 3 May 2016 at 21:37, Merlin Moncure wrote:
>
> There is library out there, unfortunately GPL licensed, that attempts
> to fully implement posix including fork(): http://midipix.org/. One
> of these days I'd like to have a go at porting postgres to it.
... and here I thought you'd be keen t
On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 7:36 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 7:07 AM, Anastasia Lubennikova
> wrote:
>> Hi, hackers.
>> There's a couple of questions about processes.
>>
>> I found EXEC_BACKEND flag, while reading the code.
>> As I understood, it exists because we have to emulate
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 7:07 AM, Anastasia Lubennikova
wrote:
> Hi, hackers.
> There's a couple of questions about processes.
>
> I found EXEC_BACKEND flag, while reading the code.
> As I understood, it exists because we have to emulate fork() on WIN32.
> And also it allows to debug the same behav
Hi, hackers.
There's a couple of questions about processes.
I found EXEC_BACKEND flag, while reading the code.
As I understood, it exists because we have to emulate fork() on WIN32.
And also it allows to debug the same behavior on Linux.
Is it right? Are there any other use cases?
Another questi
