URL added to TODO. I assume there has been no more progress on this patch.
---
Bernd Helmle wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Please find attached a patch that implements SQL92-compatible updatable
> views. The patch introduces new
Tom Lane wrote:
Worst case is we promote WITH to a fully reserved word. While I don't
normally care for doing that, it *is* a reserved word per SQL99, and
offhand I don't see likely scenarios for someone using "with" as a table
or column or function name. (Anyone know of a language in which "w
> A quick look at the grammar suggests that the key problem is the
> opt_timezone production --- it might be that if we removed that in
> favor of spelling out the alternatives at the call sites, the conflict
> would go away. bison-fu is all about postponing shift/reduce decisions
> until you've s
Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, 2006-03-12 at 23:39 +0800, William ZHANG wrote:
>> Maybe you can fix it like UNIONJOIN.
> Indeed, that is one option.
Not any more ;-)
> It would be unfortunate to revert the change, but I doubt the overhead
> is very significant. Does anyone hav
On Sun, 2006-03-12 at 23:39 +0800, William ZHANG wrote:
> Maybe you can fix it like UNIONJOIN.
Indeed, that is one option. Because the syntax is WITH [ LOCAL |
CASCADED ] CHECK OPTION, ISTM we'll actually need three new tokens:
WITH_LOCAL, WITH_CASCADED, and WITH_CHECK, which is even uglier :-( Pe
On 3/13/06, Bernd Helmle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> --On Sonntag, März 12, 2006 23:52:12 -0500 Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 2006-03-10 at 11:21 +0100, Bernd Helmle wrote:
> >> Please find attached a patch that implements SQL92-compatible updatable
> >> views.
> >
> >
--On Sonntag, März 12, 2006 23:52:12 -0500 Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Fri, 2006-03-10 at 11:21 +0100, Bernd Helmle wrote:
Please find attached a patch that implements SQL92-compatible updatable
views.
I'm currently reviewing this. Comments later...
ok
Please note t
On Fri, 2006-03-10 at 11:21 +0100, Bernd Helmle wrote:
> Please find attached a patch that implements SQL92-compatible updatable
> views.
I'm currently reviewing this. Comments later...
> Please note that the patch isn't complete yet
Do you have a list of known TODO items?
-Neil
---
"Bernd Helmle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Hi folks,
> The supported syntax is
>
> CREATE VIEW foo AS SELECT ... [WITH [LOCAL | CASCADED] CHECK OPTION];
>
> The LOCAL and CASCADED keywords are optional when a CHECK OPTION is
> specified, the default is CASCADED (this syntax creates a shift/reduce
> conf
Hi folks,
Please find attached a patch that implements SQL92-compatible updatable
views. The patch introduces new semantics into the rule system: implicit
and explicit rules. Implicit rules are created to implement updatable views:
_INSERT
_NOTHING_INSERT (unconditional DO INSTEAD NOTHING rul
10 matches
Mail list logo
