Merlin Moncure wrote:
> Jeff wrote:
> > Is there a practical use for retrieving > 2^31 records at once?
> >
> > (this is a serious question, I'm not arguing that it should cause a
> > syntax error)
> >
> > Regards,
> > Jeff Davis
> >
> > On Mon, 2005-01-24 at 14:13 -0500, Merlin Moncure wrot
Jeff wrote:
> Is there a practical use for retrieving > 2^31 records at once?
>
> (this is a serious question, I'm not arguing that it should cause a
> syntax error)
>
> Regards,
> Jeff Davis
>
> On Mon, 2005-01-24 at 14:13 -0500, Merlin Moncure wrote:
> > I was browsing the TODO list and
Is there a practical use for retrieving > 2^31 records at once?
(this is a serious question, I'm not arguing that it should cause a
syntax error)
Regards,
Jeff Davis
On Mon, 2005-01-24 at 14:13 -0500, Merlin Moncure wrote:
> I was browsing the TODO list and I noticed the todo to bump lim
I was browsing the TODO list and I noticed the todo to bump limit/offset
to int8. IMO, the flavors of fetch that take a numeric parameter need
this as well.
FWIW, trying to pass integer > 2^31 to fetch gives a syntax error, which
is clearly wrong.
Merlin
---(end of broad
