On Sat, 2012-09-08 at 16:52 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> How come you did not back-patch that commit ... are we not supporting
> 3.3 in branches before 9.2 for some reason?
Python 3.3 isn't even released yet, much less so back then, so it seemed
premature.
Also, it's a fairly big change just to make
Peter Eisentraut writes:
> On Sat, 2012-09-08 at 16:35 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I think probably the best thing is to change the test case so it has
>> one valid key and one not-valid one, rather than assuming that the
>> same key will always be complained of when there's more than one
>> not-val
On Sat, 2012-09-08 at 16:35 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> and obviously, python is iterating through the hash's keys in a
> different order than it was a minor version or two back. (The failure
> is occurring with 3.3.0-0.4.rc1.fc19, whereas I saw no failure with
> 3.2.3-7.fc17.)
Yes, known problem wi
After reading the recent thread about python 2 vs python 3 support,
I thought I'd amuse myself by trying to get plpython3 supported in
the Fedora packages. That turned out to be unreasonably painful
(which is something we oughta fix eventually), but it worked,
at least with F16/F17. When I went t
