Re: [HACKERS] Question regarding coopting Database Engine

2003-10-07 Thread Hans-Jürgen Schönig
Steve Yalovitser wrote: Hello, I'd like to know if its possible to coopt the postgres storage subsystem to rely entirely on ram based structures, rather than disk. Any documentation or ideas would be appreciated. Cheers, Steve ---(end of broadcast)

Re: [HACKERS] Question regarding coopting Database Engine

2003-10-03 Thread Gottfried F. Zojer
Hi Steve , I m interested on similar things but I m too new to PostgreSQL to give any hint . My first approach is to compile with a different compiler to get a idea of the system. Best regards Gottfried "Steve Yalovitser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am 03.10.03 17:29:16: > > Hello, > > I

Re: [HACKERS] Question regarding coopting Database Engine

2003-10-03 Thread Rod Taylor
On Tue, 2003-09-30 at 00:10, Steve Yalovitser wrote: > Hello, > > I'd like to know if its possible to coopt the postgres storage subsystem to > rely entirely on ram based structures, rather than disk. Any documentation > or ideas would be appreciated. Just so you know, this isn't going to make th

Re: [HACKERS] Question regarding coopting Database Engine

2003-10-03 Thread scott.marlowe
On Tue, 30 Sep 2003, Steve Yalovitser wrote: > Hello, > > I'd like to know if its possible to coopt the postgres storage subsystem to > rely entirely on ram based structures, rather than disk. Any documentation > or ideas would be appreciated. Sure, create a ram disk. Set $PGDATA to it with pro

[HACKERS] Question regarding coopting Database Engine

2003-10-03 Thread Steve Yalovitser
Hello, I'd like to know if its possible to coopt the postgres storage subsystem to rely entirely on ram based structures, rather than disk. Any documentation or ideas would be appreciated. Cheers, Steve ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 1: subscribe a