Re: [HACKERS] RFC for more header changes

2008-06-15 Thread Tom Lane
Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I noticed that "typedef Relation *RelationData" could be moved to > relcache.h instead of rel.h. This seems OK. > While doing that, I noticed that there are some trigger definitions in > rel.h that really belong to trigger.h. I think you should leave

[HACKERS] RFC for more header changes

2008-06-15 Thread Alvaro Herrera
I noticed that "typedef Relation *RelationData" could be moved to relcache.h instead of rel.h. This means not #including rel.h in a ton of header files, instead including just relcache.h. This is a good thing because relcache.h is a much more lightweight header; rel.h on the other hand needs quit