Re: [HACKERS] RHEL6 packaging issue for 9.4 beta - libevent conflict

2014-06-18 Thread Joshua D. Drake
On 06/18/2014 06:34 AM, Tom Lane wrote: Craig Ringer writes: I posted about a possible packaging issue with RHEL 6 PGDG packages for 9.4beta on pgsql-yum-pkg, but things are pretty quiet over there (a prior mail asking about what happened with moving to git hasn't had a response). http://www.p

Re: [HACKERS] RHEL6 packaging issue for 9.4 beta - libevent conflict

2014-06-18 Thread Devrim Gündüz
Hi, On Wed, 2014-06-18 at 09:41 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > The only thing I can think of offhand that would require it is > pgbouncer. Yeah. Recent pgbouncer versions require libevent 2.0+, and RHEL 6 has 1.4. Regards, -- Devrim GÜNDÜZ Principal Systems Engineer @ EnterpriseDB: http://www.

Re: [HACKERS] RHEL6 packaging issue for 9.4 beta - libevent conflict

2014-06-18 Thread Andrew Dunstan
On 06/18/2014 09:34 AM, Tom Lane wrote: Craig Ringer writes: I posted about a possible packaging issue with RHEL 6 PGDG packages for 9.4beta on pgsql-yum-pkg, but things are pretty quiet over there (a prior mail asking about what happened with moving to git hasn't had a response). http://www.p

Re: [HACKERS] RHEL6 packaging issue for 9.4 beta - libevent conflict

2014-06-18 Thread Tom Lane
Craig Ringer writes: > I posted about a possible packaging issue with RHEL 6 PGDG packages for > 9.4beta on pgsql-yum-pkg, but things are pretty quiet over there (a > prior mail asking about what happened with moving to git hasn't had a > response). > http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/53a10ef9.

[HACKERS] RHEL6 packaging issue for 9.4 beta - libevent conflict

2014-06-18 Thread Craig Ringer
Hi all I posted about a possible packaging issue with RHEL 6 PGDG packages for 9.4beta on pgsql-yum-pkg, but things are pretty quiet over there (a prior mail asking about what happened with moving to git hasn't had a response). Given that time is a concern with 9.4, I thought I'd raise it here.