Andrew Gierth writes:
> "Tom" == Tom Lane writes:
> Tom> Back to the point at hand: do we want to look at making plpgsql
> Tom> respect the GUC?
> Surely what matters is the value of the GUC at the time that you did
> the CREATE FUNCTION, not the value at the time you happen to be
> calling it
> "Tom" == Tom Lane writes:
Tom> Back to the point at hand: do we want to look at making plpgsql
Tom> respect the GUC?
Surely what matters is the value of the GUC at the time that you did
the CREATE FUNCTION, not the value at the time you happen to be
calling it?
--
Andrew (irc:RhodiumTo
Tom Lane wrote:
> do we want to look at making plpgsql respect the GUC?
+1
> I'm inclined to deal with the special case (RAISE and anything else
> similar) by changing the code so that we *do* feed the string
> literal through the main parser, not for any functional effect but
> just to have
Bruce Momjian writes:
> Kevin Grittner wrote:
>> My personal bias is to go to the standard behavior as the default at
>> some point. For legacy reasons, I don't know that you would ever want
>> to remove the setting; especially since I don't think it adds much
>> code if you're going to support t
Kevin Grittner wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > It would be nice to know if we are ever going to set
> > standard_conforming_strings to on.
>
> My personal bias is to go to the standard behavior as the default at
> some point. For legacy reasons, I don't know that you would ever want
> to remo
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> It would be nice to know if we are ever going to set
> standard_conforming_strings to on.
My personal bias is to go to the standard behavior as the default at
some point. For legacy reasons, I don't know that you would ever want
to remove the setting; especially since I d
I wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> I think you are confusing parsing of the string literal that
>> is the argument of CREATE FUNCTION with the parsing that the
plpgsql
>> interpreter does on the function body once it gets it.
> Oh, I'm not confused about that at all. I'm arguing that it's a bad
>
