Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Kevin Grittner kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov writes:
a change to CREATE FUNCTION such that there is an implied SET
standard_compliant_strings FROM CURRENT
Hopefully obvious, I meant standard_conforming_strings.
it seems like a really bad idea.
Then
Andrew Gierth and...@tao11.riddles.org.uk wrote:
Surely what matters is the value of the GUC at the time that you did
the CREATE FUNCTION, not the value at the time you happen to be
calling it?
Well, that's a change I'm arguing for. That would require both the
plpgsql parser change Tom is
Kevin Grittner kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov writes:
Well, that's a change I'm arguing for. That would require both the
plpgsql parser change Tom is talking about, and a change to CREATE
FUNCTION such that there is an implied SET standard_compliant_strings
FROM CURRENT -- which is something
