Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add --synchronous option to pg_receivexlog, for more reliable WA

2015-11-19 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On 9/15/15 11:04 PM, Fujii Masao wrote: > If --slot option is specified, pg_receivexlog reports a flush position to > the server even though --synchronous is not specified. So users might think > that --synchrnous option is not necessary for synchronous pg_receivexlog > setting. But that's not true

[HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add --synchronous option to pg_receivexlog, for more reliable WA

2015-09-15 Thread Fujii Masao
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 11:25 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On 11/17/14 12:34 PM, Fujii Masao wrote: >> Add --synchronous option to pg_receivexlog, for more reliable WAL writing. > > The last two sentences of this piece of documentation are a bit > hand-wavy and hard to parse. Could you clarify t

[HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add --synchronous option to pg_receivexlog, for more reliable WA

2015-09-15 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On 11/17/14 12:34 PM, Fujii Masao wrote: > Add --synchronous option to pg_receivexlog, for more reliable WAL writing. The last two sentences of this piece of documentation are a bit hand-wavy and hard to parse. Could you clarify this? -S slotname --slot=slotname