Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Don't need -Wno-error anymore, because flex is no longer

On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 07:23:40PM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote: Am Dienstag, 18. März 2008 schrieb Bruce Momjian: Peter Eisentraut wrote: Log Message: --- Don't need -Wno-error anymore, because flex is no longer producing warnings. I see this patch only affects ecpg?

[HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Don't need -Wno-error anymore, because flex is no longer

Peter Eisentraut wrote: Log Message: --- Don't need -Wno-error anymore, because flex is no longer producing warnings. I see this patch only affects ecpg? Is this related to Tom's report from trying the new flex? Are we assuming that all CVS build people also have the new flex? Is

Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Don't need -Wno-error anymore, because flex is no longer

Am Dienstag, 18. März 2008 schrieb Bruce Momjian: Peter Eisentraut wrote: Log Message: --- Don't need -Wno-error anymore, because flex is no longer producing warnings. I see this patch only affects ecpg? Is this related to Tom's report from trying the new flex? Yes. There

Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Don't need -Wno-error anymore, because flex is no longer

Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I think it is reasonable to assume that those wanting to use -Werror should use the new flex, because if they don't the build will fail anyway, at any of the other lexers. It's been true for quite a long time that only ecpg's lexer generated any