Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas writes:
> > 2009/3/24 Tom Lane :
> >> catversion bumped because of change in GIN's pg_am entry, and because
> >> the format of GIN indexes changed on-disk (there's a metapage now,
> >> and possibly a pending list).
>
> > Will this break pg_migrator?
>
> No worse tha
Robert Haas writes:
> 2009/3/24 Tom Lane :
>> catversion bumped because of change in GIN's pg_am entry, and because
>> the format of GIN indexes changed on-disk (there's a metapage now,
>> and possibly a pending list).
> Will this break pg_migrator?
No worse than it's already broken by hash inde
2009/3/24 Tom Lane :
> Implement "fastupdate" support for GIN indexes, in which we try to accumulate
> multiple index entries in a holding area before adding them to the main index
> structure. This helps because bulk insert is (usually) significantly faster
> than retail insert for GIN.
>
> This
