On 5 January 2013 19:15, Tom Lane wrote:
>> We need a full "one-shot" concept linking the planner and executor for
>> all sorts of reasons, not just this one. We can discuss the
>> practicality of individual optimizations but the linkage should be
>> clear throughout the whole infrastructure.
>
>
Simon Riggs writes:
> On 4 January 2013 22:42, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Invent a "one-shot" variant of CachedPlans for better performance.
> Just a moment of reflection here but I did already invent a "one-shot"
> plan concept in a patch submission to 9.2, called exactly that, which
> enables a variet
On 4 January 2013 22:42, Tom Lane wrote:
> Invent a "one-shot" variant of CachedPlans for better performance.
...
> Back-patch to 9.2, since this was a performance regression compared to 9.1.
> (In 9.2, place the added struct fields so as to avoid changing the offsets
> of existing fields.)
>
> H
