Hiroshi Saito wrote:
> Hi Alvaro-san.
>
> Yeah, It seems that it saves also except pl. then, It also regards me as very
> good.
> I tested just now, of course, it is very comfortable. :-)
Thanks, Hiroshi-san. I just applied that last version.
--
Alvaro Herreraht
Hi Alvaro-san.
Yeah, It seems that it saves also except pl. then, It also regards me as very
good.
I tested just now, of course, it is very comfortable. :-)
== try ==
C:\work>psql -e -f plpgsql_test.sql
show client_encoding;
client_encoding
-
latin1
(1 row)
show server_encodin
Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera writes:
> > Understood. In fact, after having a look at this patch and giving it a
> > little refactoring I think it's pretty obvious; right now we're calling
> > bind_textdomain_codeset only for the main domain, and with this patch we
> > also set it for all othe
Alvaro Herrera writes:
> Understood. In fact, after having a look at this patch and giving it a
> little refactoring I think it's pretty obvious; right now we're calling
> bind_textdomain_codeset only for the main domain, and with this patch we
> also set it for all other domains we use.
> Does
Hiroshi Saito wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Ummm, I present is not understood by the reason of Japanese. ...
> Therefore, It was made into the Spanish case. I know that Alvaro-san will
> understand Spanish well.
>
> ==postgresql.conf==
> lc_messages= 'es'
>
> server.log of a patch before and after was appl
Hi.
Ummm, I present is not understood by the reason of Japanese. ...
Therefore, It was made into the Spanish case.
I know that Alvaro-san will understand Spanish well.
==postgresql.conf==
lc_messages= 'es'
server.log of a patch before and after was applied.
Please see it.
Regards,
Hiro
Hi Peter-san.
I see the problem for being an original domain in plpgsql. It differs from what
codeset meant at postmaster by Japanese windows
Please see, this look at the problem on which SJIS enters into a message.
http://winpg.jp/~saito/pg_work/LC_MESSAGE_CHECK/plpgsql/before_plpgsql_serv
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Log Message:
---
Redefine _() to dgettext() instead of gettext() so that it uses the plpgsql
text domain, instead of the postgres one (or whatever the default may be).
Hmm, so is this needed on all other PLs too?
In principle yes. Or cal
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Log Message:
> ---
> Redefine _() to dgettext() instead of gettext() so that it uses the plpgsql
> text domain, instead of the postgres one (or whatever the default may be).
Hmm, so is this needed on all other PLs too?
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgs
