Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Oct 2007 00:10:27 +0100
> Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > > Actually, that's why I only put the script in tools, and didn't
> > > modify anything else ... I didn't figure anyone would object to it
> > > being added i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --On Tuesday, October 30, 2007 16:20:16 -0700 "Joshua D. Drake"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Oct 2007 00:10:27 +0100
> Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>> > Actually, that's why I only put the sc
On Wed, 31 Oct 2007 00:10:27 +0100
Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > Actually, that's why I only put the script in tools, and didn't
> > modify anything else ... I didn't figure anyone would object to it
> > being added in there, since, unlike the contrib st
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> Actually, that's why I only put the script in tools, and didn't
> modify anything else ... I didn't figure anyone would object to it
> being added in there, since, unlike the contrib stuff, it isn't
> actually tied anywhere in the build infrastructure :(
Sure, but people
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --On Tuesday, October 30, 2007 13:36:45 -0400 Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> "Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Unfortunately, it isn't usable right now, as it does require a modification
>> to configure.in, which I haven't
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --On Tuesday, October 30, 2007 13:50:16 -0400 Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Interesting ... may I inquire what is this for? And why was it applied
>> so late in the cycle, without any previou
Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Interesting ... may I inquire what is this for? And why was it applied
> so late in the cycle, without any previous proposal or discussion?
This is an outgrowth of a core discussion that really should've been
taken public before anything was done about
"Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Unfortunately, it isn't usable right now, as it does require a modification
> to
> configure.in, which I haven't applied, to avoid a link step in ecpg,
> specifically:
Rather than modifying configure (and having to use a nonstandard
configure com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --On Tuesday, October 30, 2007 11:44:12 -0300 Alvaro Herrera
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>> Log Message:
>> ---
>>
>> simple script to pull together a very small (<500k) tar file that builds
>> *just* libpq ... it
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> Log Message:
> ---
>
> simple script to pull together a very small (<500k) tar file that builds
> *just* libpq ... its not perfect, as it pulls in more files then is
> necessarily required to build, but as it is, it requires one simple patch
> to configure.in in
10 matches
Mail list logo
