On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 1:21 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas writes:
>> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 12:53 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> I'd be the first to agree that this point is inadequately documented
>>> in the code, but PostmasterRandom should be reserved for its existing
>>> security-related uses
On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 7:44 PM, Michael Paquier
wrote:
>> Thanks for reviewing the patch. I have added the entry for this patch in
>> next CF (https://commitfest.postgresql.org/10/636/), feel free to mark it
>> as Ready for committer if you think patch is good.
>
> Yeah, it is definitely better
On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 3:01 AM, Amit Kapila wrote:
> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 9:44 PM, Michael Paquier
> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 12:11 AM, Amit Kapila
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Okay, attached patch just does that and I have verified that it allows
>> > to
>> > start multiple services in w
On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 9:44 PM, Michael Paquier
wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 12:11 AM, Amit Kapila
wrote:
> >
> > Okay, attached patch just does that and I have verified that it allows
to
> > start multiple services in windows. In off list discussion with
Robert, he
> > suggested not to c
On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 12:11 AM, Amit Kapila wrote:
> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 2:31 AM, Michael Paquier
> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 4:16 AM, Amit Kapila
>> wrote:
>> > On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 9:45 AM, Michael Paquier
>> >
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 3:34 PM, Amit
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 2:31 AM, Michael Paquier
wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 4:16 AM, Amit Kapila
wrote:
> > On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 9:45 AM, Michael Paquier <
michael.paqu...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 3:34 PM, Amit Kapila
> >> wrote:
> >> > Sounds sensible,
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 6:01 AM, Michael Paquier
wrote:
> EACCES is a bit too low-level... I had in mind to check GetLastError
> with only ERROR_ACCESS_DENIED, and retry only in this case, which is
> the case where one postmaster is trying to access the segment of
> another.
s/low/high/.
--
Mich
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 4:16 AM, Amit Kapila wrote:
> On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 9:45 AM, Michael Paquier
> wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 3:34 PM, Amit Kapila
>> wrote:
>> > Sounds sensible, but if we want to that route, shall we have some
>> > mechanism
>> > such that if retrying it for 10
On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 9:45 AM, Michael Paquier
wrote:
>
> On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 3:34 PM, Amit Kapila
wrote:
> > Sounds sensible, but if we want to that route, shall we have some
mechanism
> > such that if retrying it for 10 times (10 is somewhat arbitrary, but we
> > retry 10 times in PGShare
On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 3:34 PM, Amit Kapila wrote:
> On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 7:33 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 12:56 AM, Amit Kapila
>> wrote:
>> >> >> Yes, same random number generation is not the problem. In windows
>> >> >> apart
>> >> >> from EEXIST error, EACCES als
On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 3:17 AM, Michael Paquier
wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 1:56 PM, Amit Kapila wrote:
>> So as far as I can see there are two ways to resolve this issue, one is to
>> retry generation of dsm name if CreateFileMapping returns EACCES and second
>> is to append data_dir name t
On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 4:17 PM, Michael Paquier
wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 1:56 PM, Amit Kapila wrote:
>> So as far as I can see there are two ways to resolve this issue, one is to
>> retry generation of dsm name if CreateFileMapping returns EACCES and second
>> is to append data_dir name t
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 1:56 PM, Amit Kapila wrote:
> So as far as I can see there are two ways to resolve this issue, one is to
> retry generation of dsm name if CreateFileMapping returns EACCES and second
> is to append data_dir name to dsm name as the same is done for main shared
> memory, that
On 21 March 2016 at 20:46, Haribabu Kommi wrote:
>
> No. Not as local service. The user should be the new standard user
> that is created
> in the system.
>
Which was done how, exactly?
Commands run? Steps taken?
PostgreSQL drops privileges once it starts, so it's actually pretty OK to
run it
14 matches
Mail list logo
