[HACKERS] RE: [PATCHES] RE: SSL Connections [doc PATCH]

2001-01-24 Thread Magnus Hagander
That would probably be good, yes :-) You shuold then change: mv privkey.pem cert.pem.pw openssl rsa -in cert.pem.pw -out cert.pem to openssl rsa -in privkey.pem -out cert.pem (Sorry, don't have access to the SGML source now, so I can't give you a patch) //Magnus -Original Message-

[HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] RE: SSL Connections [doc PATCH]

2001-01-24 Thread Bruce Momjian
But shouldn't we remove it to make it clearer? Needs fixing - no. The current version *works*. The fix would remove one unnecessary step from it, but it still *works* in it's current state. Sorry about this - I've missed looking at it. //Magnus -Original Message- From:

[HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] RE: SSL Connections [doc PATCH]

2001-01-24 Thread Bruce Momjian
Again, is this something that needs fixing? Just a YES or NO is all I need. It looks Ok, but it has one unnecessary step. There is no need to do the "mv privkey.pem cert.pem.pw" if you just use "privkey.pem" in the following openssl command (e.g. openssl rsa -in privkey.pem -out

[HACKERS] RE: [PATCHES] RE: SSL Connections [doc PATCH]

2001-01-24 Thread Magnus Hagander
Needs fixing - no. The current version *works*. The fix would remove one unnecessary step from it, but it still *works* in it's current state. Sorry about this - I've missed looking at it. //Magnus -Original Message- From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: den 24

[HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] RE: SSL Connections [doc PATCH]

2001-01-24 Thread Bruce Momjian
That would probably be good, yes :-) You shuold then change: mv privkey.pem cert.pem.pw openssl rsa -in cert.pem.pw -out cert.pem to openssl rsa -in privkey.pem -out cert.pem (Sorry, don't have access to the SGML source now, so I can't give you a patch) OK, the SGML diff is: