I wrote:
> Given the infrequency of use of postfix operators compared to prefix,
> I am inclined to think that we should change the grammar to make the
> latter easier to use at the expense of the former. On the other hand,
> it seems there's a pretty large risk of backwards-incompatibility here.
On Sat, Jan 20, 2001 at 01:31:49PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Given the infrequency of use of postfix operators compared to prefix,
> I am inclined to think that we should change the grammar to make the
> latter easier to use at the expense of the former. On the other hand,
> it seems there's a pre
Marko Kreen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I can still reproduce it:
> marko=# SELECT 5 & ~6;
> ERROR: Unable to identify a right operator '&' for type 'int4'
> You may need to add parentheses or an explicit cast
Correct, we did not rejigger the operator precedence.
I played around with
Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This patch was installed, with xor as "#". The parser still needs work.
> Besides the known issue of "|", this also parses funny:
> => select 5 & ~ 6;
> ERROR: Unable to identify a right operator '&' for type 'int4'
I think we're kind of stuck o
