* Karel Zak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010329 03:10] wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 04:10:52PM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> > * Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010328 16:07] wrote:
> > > Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > > FYI, the WU-FTPD code (2.6.0 or better) has a couple of more p
> Tom Lane writes:
>
> > Mathijs Brands <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > mathijs297 0.1 0.2 6120 3352 pts/1S 01:59:18 0:00
>/opt/pgsql/bin/./postgres mathijs localhost template1 idle
> >
> > The interesting point about this is that the 7.0.3-on-2.7 installation
> > *is* managing to c
Tom Lane writes:
> Mathijs Brands <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > mathijs297 0.1 0.2 6120 3352 pts/1S 01:59:18 0:00
>/opt/pgsql/bin/./postgres mathijs localhost template1 idle
>
> The interesting point about this is that the 7.0.3-on-2.7 installation
> *is* managing to change its PS d
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > FYI, the WU-FTPD code (2.6.0 or better) has a couple of more platforms
> > > including UnixWare. The UnixWare code will need /dev/kmem permission to
> > > change it's stuff, so I don't know whether we want to do this or not
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 04:10:52PM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> * Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010328 16:07] wrote:
> > Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > FYI, the WU-FTPD code (2.6.0 or better) has a couple of more platforms
> > > including UnixWare. The UnixWare code will ne
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 07:12:39PM -0500, Tom Lane allegedly wrote:
> Mathijs Brands <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > mathijs297 0.1 0.2 6120 3352 pts/1S 01:59:18 0:00
>/opt/pgsql/bin/./postgres mathijs localhost template1 idle
>
> The interesting point about this is that the 7.0.3-on-
> Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > FYI, the WU-FTPD code (2.6.0 or better) has a couple of more platforms
> > including UnixWare. The UnixWare code will need /dev/kmem permission to
> > change it's stuff, so I don't know whether we want to do this or not, but
> > if people are lo
> Mathijs Brands <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > PS_USE_CLOBBER_ARGV -is- used on Solaris. I just checked.
>
> Hm. But 7.1 postgres backends fail to change their ps display?
> Does sendmail change its ps display on your machine?
Seems we could easily use the sendmail display to populate the ps
> > On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 05:33:05PM -0500, Bruce Momjian allegedly wrote:
> >> Sure 'ps -U' will work, but it was reported that on Solaris, plain ps
> >> can't show the postgres status display, while ucb/ps can. I don't need
> >> specific columns. What I need is the postgres status parameters
Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If it for pgmonitor then you guys ought to just mark it broken on
> these platforms, the non-"ps based" solution could have been
> implemented with all the time wasted trying to get the "ps based"
> hack working. :(
My thoughts exactly ;-) ... I'm wi
Mathijs Brands <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> mathijs297 0.1 0.2 6120 3352 pts/1S 01:59:18 0:00
>/opt/pgsql/bin/./postgres mathijs localhost template1 idle
The interesting point about this is that the 7.0.3-on-2.7 installation
*is* managing to change its PS display. So either Solaris
* Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010328 16:07] wrote:
> Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > FYI, the WU-FTPD code (2.6.0 or better) has a couple of more platforms
> > including UnixWare. The UnixWare code will need /dev/kmem permission to
> > change it's stuff, so I don't know whether
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 06:48:27PM -0500, Tom Lane allegedly wrote:
> Mathijs Brands <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > PS_USE_CLOBBER_ARGV -is- used on Solaris. I just checked.
>
> Hm. But 7.1 postgres backends fail to change their ps display?
> Does sendmail change its ps display on your machine?
Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> FYI, the WU-FTPD code (2.6.0 or better) has a couple of more platforms
> including UnixWare. The UnixWare code will need /dev/kmem permission to
> change it's stuff, so I don't know whether we want to do this or not, but
> if people are looking at t
Mathijs Brands <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> PS_USE_CLOBBER_ARGV -is- used on Solaris. I just checked.
Hm. But 7.1 postgres backends fail to change their ps display?
Does sendmail change its ps display on your machine?
regards, tom lane
---(end o
On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 12:30:06AM +0200, Mathijs Brands allegedly wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 04:56:15PM -0500, Bruce Momjian allegedly wrote:
> > [ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
> > > whats wrong with /usr/ucb/ps auxw | grep $PGUSER
> > >
> > > to get only the processes
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 04:56:15PM -0500, Bruce Momjian allegedly wrote:
> [ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
> > whats wrong with /usr/ucb/ps auxw | grep $PGUSER
> >
> > to get only the processes for PG?
>
> I can do that if there is no other option, but on my BSDI machine,
> re
Bruce Momjian writes:
> Can someone confirm that 'ps' status display doesn't work on Solaris,
You may need to use /usr/ucb/ps. Last I checked there was no way to
change the display of /usr/bin/ps.
--
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://yi.org/peter-e/
--
18 matches
Mail list logo
