Re: [HACKERS] Re: [sqlsmith] FailedAssertion("!(k == indices_count)", File: "tsvector_op.c", Line: 511)

2016-08-05 Thread Tom Lane
Robert Haas writes: > Action within 72 hours now seems inadequate; we are scheduled to wrap > rc1 on Monday. We need someone to either fix these bugs very very > soon, or decide to ship beta4 instead of rc1 (uggh), or decide it's OK > to ship rc1 with these known defects, or postpone the planned

Re: [HACKERS] Re: [sqlsmith] FailedAssertion("!(k == indices_count)", File: "tsvector_op.c", Line: 511)

2016-08-05 Thread Robert Haas
On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 12:14 AM, Noah Misch wrote: > On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 05:52:44PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> I wrote: >> > I'm thinking there are two distinct bugs here. >> >> Actually, make that three bugs. I was so focused on the crashing >> that I failed to notice that ts_delete wasn't pr

[HACKERS] Re: [sqlsmith] FailedAssertion("!(k == indices_count)", File: "tsvector_op.c", Line: 511)

2016-08-03 Thread Noah Misch
On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 05:52:44PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > I wrote: > > I'm thinking there are two distinct bugs here. > > Actually, make that three bugs. I was so focused on the crashing > that I failed to notice that ts_delete wasn't producing sane answers > even when it didn't crash: [Action